Advertisement

Vivo NEX A performance test: not quite powerhouse material

The Vivo NEX A is the somewhat cheaper version of the flagship. Equipped with Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 710, the device should offer very good performance, but at a lower price. In our performance, we’ll be looking to see if the Vivo NEX A comes in right in between mid-range smartphones like the Nokia 7 Plus and current top smartphones like the Xperia XZ2 from Sony or Samsung’s Galaxy S9.

Jump directly to section:

How do we test smartphone performance?

We’ve selected several benchmarks for our tests, which we run three times in a row on our test devices. We use the following benchmarks:

Using these values, we can compare smartphones with one another with the help of measurable criteria. But that’s not enough: what use are benchmark values if the smartphone doesn’t live up to them in everyday life? That’s why we also test real-world scenarios and look at current games like Final Fantasy XV Pocket Edition, Hearthstone or PUBG.

Powerful without special features

Vivo uses Qualcomm’s latest SoC in the NEX A: the Snapdragon 710, the first of the 700 series, which is positioned between the mid-range SoC of the 600 series and the high-end 800 series. Take a look at our comparison table to see how the SoC in the Vivo NEX A performs compared to the SD845 and SD660.

Snapdragon 660 vs. Snapdragon 710 vs. Snapdragon 845

Snapdragon 660 Snapdragon 710 Snapdragon 845
14 nm 10 nm 10 nm
Kyro 260 Kyro 360 Kyro 385

X12, 3x CA, 600 Mbps DL

X15, 3x CA, 800 Mbps DL X20, 5x CA, 1,2 Gbps DL
802.11ac, 2×2 MIMO 802.11 ac, 2×2 MIMO 802.11 ad, 2×2 MIMO
Adreno 512 Adreno 616 Adreno 630
Spectra 160 Spectra 250 Spectra 280
Hexagon 680 Hexagon 685 Hexagon 685
QHD, 8 Layer QHD+ 10 Layer, 4K HDR Playback Ultra HD Premium
QuickCharge 4+ QuickCharge 4+ QuickCharge 4+

The most obvious reason to use the Snapdragon 710 in the Vivo NEX A is to lower the price. As an uncompromising alternative, there will also be the Vivo NEX S, which will feature Qualcomm’s top-of-the-line SoC model, as well as the in-display fingerprint sensor. According to the current conversion rate, the top model will cost around 800 dollars to import via China.

Xiaomi Mi 8 benchmark results

  Pixel 2 XL
(Snapdragon 835)
Huawei P20 Pro
(Kirin 970)
Galaxy S9
(Exynos 9810)
Sony Xperia XZ2
(Snapdragon 845)
Vivo NEX A
(Snapdragon 710)
Nokia 7 Plus
(Snapdragon 660)
Geekbench CPU
Single core
1867 1920 3645 2412 1879 1634
Geekbench CPU
Multicore
6291 6780 8820 8420 5918 5865
3D Mark
Sling Shot ES 3.1
3571 2972 3274 4679 1827 1330
3D Mark
Sling Shot ES 3.0
4714 3346 3873 6140 2789 2018
3D Mark
Ice Storm Unlimited ES 2.0
37844 30602 38488 63589 28238 26385
PassMark Memory
(RAM)
13836 14087 24721 12418 12421 12495
PassMark Disk
(Storage)
47759 64144 72538 73208 67656 49866

So how does the hardware-software combination of the Vivo NEX A compare to current top smartphones? It’s not so bad at all. It’s clear that the A version of the Vivo NEX can’t match the processor and graphic performance of a Galaxy S9 with Exynos 9810 and certainly can’t keep up with the Sony Xperia XZ2 with Snapdragon 845. But at least Vivo can nearly achieve the performance of a top smartphone from 2017. A Pixel 2 XL or Huawei Mate 10 Pro are still faster in our benchmark test, but the Vivo NEX A is not that far behind.

You have to remember that the Snapdragon 710 is also an octacore processor, but compared to the 800 series, the Kirin 970 or Exynos 9810, it functions differently. Instead of combining four energy-efficient cores with four high-performance cores as usual, the Snapdragon 710 is based on a cluster of six ARM Cortex A55 cores that are trimmed for efficiency and then just two high-performance ARM Cortex A77 cores. From this alone, you could classify the performance of the SoC in the new Vivo NEX A as “very good”.

AndroidPIT vivo nex a front3
The difference between Vivo NEX A and the S version won’t be visible. / © AndroidPIT

Hardly any difference in everyday performance!

Even if the Vivo NEX A can’t keep up with the current flagships in the benchmarks, it doesn’t mean it’s a slow smartphone. The animations on the home screen and throughout Funtouch OS, Vivo’s UI, run smoothly and without visible jerks. Of course, you have to get used to the peculiarities at first, but there shouldn’t be taken into account in this kind of test.

AndroidPIT vivo nex a pop up camera2
If we’re honest, you’d only want to buy the Vivo NEX for the motorized selfie camera, right? / © AndroidPIT

The new Qualcomm SoC can deliver consistently good results in games. Even at maximum resolution in PUBG Mobile, Final Fantasy XV Pocket Edition and similar graphic-intensive games, the gaming experience was smooth. In terms of performance reserves, the Snapdragon 710 in the Vivo NEX A has plenty of room to effortlessly bring the latest games onto the huger Super AMOLED screen for the coming 12 to 18 months.

What do you think of the Vivo NEX A? Is this variant enough for you, or does it have to be the S version with Qualcomm’s best SoC and a fingerprint sensor installed under the display? Let us know what you think!

Thank you for your visit on this page Vivo NEX A performance test: not quite powerhouse material

The content sourced from: https://www.androidpit.com/vivo-nex-a-performance-review

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *